Blog/Market Positioning

AI layoffs in 2026: real tsunami or corporate AI-washing?

Ismael Ouamlil
Ismael Ouamlil
CTO Traject

In January 2026, nearly 600,000 jobs were eliminated worldwide. Companies are massively invoking artificial intelligence to justify these cuts. But behind the press releases, reality is more nuanced.

The numbers that hit hard

The scale of job cuts is unprecedented. 55,000 layoffs were directly attributed to AI in 2025 — twelve times more than in 2023. Amazon cut 16,000 positions in January 2026. Meta laid off 3,600 people from its Reality Labs division. Microsoft, Intel, Salesforce, HP: the list grows every week.

Most affected sectors:

  • Customer support — replaced by conversational agents
  • Administrative functions — automation of repetitive tasks
  • Junior development — code generation tools
  • Logistics — automated warehouses
  • Retail banking — branch closures and algorithmic services

AI-washing: when AI serves as a pretext

The term "AI-washing", inspired by greenwashing, describes a growing practice: using AI as justification for layoffs driven by purely financial motives.

According to Forrester, many companies announcing AI-related cuts don't have mature applications ready to replace the eliminated positions. Oxford Economics goes further: if AI were truly replacing workers at scale, productivity should be skyrocketing. Instead, it's stagnating.

Why companies do it anyway:

  • Attributing layoffs to AI reassures investors
  • It projects an image of an innovative company
  • It's more palatable than admitting post-Covid overhiring

What the actual data shows

The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas analyzed the U.S. labor market from 2022 to 2025. Their findings are revealing:

  • Employment decline in AI-exposed jobs primarily affects young workers (ages 22-25)
  • This decline is driven more by reduced hiring than by mass layoffs
  • Employment for experienced profiles remains stable or increasing

Yale Budget Lab confirms: the share of workers across different occupations hasn't shifted massively since ChatGPT's launch.

The Forrester paradox

Forrester predicts that half of AI-attributed layoffs will be quietly offset by rehires, often offshore or at lower salaries. The pattern:

  1. The company lays off workers citing AI
  2. The promised AI doesn't work at scale
  3. The company rehires, but at lower cost

According to Deloitte, only 11% of companies are actually using agentic AI systems in production. 38% are piloting. The rest are still exploring.

Real impacts on the market

Beyond the media noise, structural transformations are underway:

  • Entry-level positions are disappearing — companies favor senior profiles who can supervise AI
  • AI skills are becoming a prerequisite — not an option
  • Hybrid roles are emerging — at the intersection of tech, business, and AI
  • Freelancing is accelerating — companies outsource what they can't yet automate

How to position yourself

In this environment, individual strategy becomes decisive:

  • Develop concrete AI skills — not just talk about AI, use it daily
  • Position yourself on business value — not on tools that change every six months
  • Document your impact — numbers, results, before/after
  • Diversify your income sources — don't depend on a single employer

To structure your repositioning with concrete market data, a tool like Traject helps identify in-demand skills and pilot your career trajectory.

Key takeaways

  • AI-attributed layoffs are often exaggerated or instrumentalized
  • Real impact concentrates on junior positions and repetitive functions
  • Experienced profiles remain sought after and stable
  • The best protection is a clear strategic positioning and operational AI skills

Articles connexes

Tout voir